[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: __GLIBC__ and uClibc
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: __GLIBC__ and uClibc |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:34:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday, November 20, 2010 13:15:48 Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger writes:
> > > uclibc defines __GLIBC__
> >
> > More exactly, uClibc *usually* defines __GLIBC__, but not always.
>
> you can say the same exact thing about glibc. uClibc defines it in the same
> way -- via features.h.
What I meant is that uClibc does not define __GLIBC__ if __FORCE_NOGLIBC is
defined.
For this reason, if you want to test for glibc OR uClibc, you can't do
#if defined __GLIBC__
; you have to write
#if defined __GLIBC__ || defined __UCLIBC__
Bruno
Re: [PATCH] printf-parse: pull in features.h for __GLIBC__, Bruno Haible, 2010/11/20