bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pipe-posix: new module


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe-posix: new module
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 03:30:20 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

Eric Blake wrote:
> testing I/O through the pipe is impossible without
> either threading or spawning a child process, all of which seem rather
> complex given how simple the module itself is.

A partial test is better than none. In fact, we already have a test for the
pipe2() function. It's easy to adapt it to the pipe() function.

In fact, this test uncovers a link error of my previous commit:
symbol rpl_pipe not found on a glibc system. I had copied the wrong idiom
into unistd.in.h. Lesson learned: Even a simple link test is better than no
test at all.


2010-12-10  Bruno Haible  <address@hidden>

        Tests for module 'pipe-posix'.
        * modules/pipe-posix-tests: New file.
        * tests/test-pipe.c: New file, based on tests/test-pipe2.c.

========================== modules/pipe-posix-tests ==========================
Files:
tests/test-pipe.c
tests/signature.h
tests/macros.h

Depends-on:
stdbool
binary-io

configure.ac:

Makefile.am:
TESTS += test-pipe
check_PROGRAMS += test-pipe
============================== tests/test-pipe.c ==============================
/* Test of pipe.
   Copyright (C) 2009-2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
   any later version.

   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
   GNU General Public License for more details.

   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
   along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
   Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.  */

#include <config.h>

#include <unistd.h>

#include "signature.h"
SIGNATURE_CHECK (pipe, int, (int[2]));

#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdbool.h>

#if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) && ! defined __CYGWIN__
/* Get declarations of the Win32 API functions.  */
# define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
# include <windows.h>
#endif

#include "binary-io.h"
#include "macros.h"

/* Return true if FD is open.  */
static bool
is_open (int fd)
{
#if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) && ! defined __CYGWIN__
  /* On Win32, the initial state of unassigned standard file
     descriptors is that they are open but point to an
     INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, and there is no fcntl.  */
  return (HANDLE) _get_osfhandle (fd) != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
#else
# ifndef F_GETFL
#  error Please port fcntl to your platform
# endif
  return 0 <= fcntl (fd, F_GETFL);
#endif
}

/* Return true if FD is not inherited to child processes.  */
static bool
is_cloexec (int fd)
{
#if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) && ! defined __CYGWIN__
  HANDLE h = (HANDLE) _get_osfhandle (fd);
  DWORD flags;
  ASSERT (GetHandleInformation (h, &flags));
  return (flags & HANDLE_FLAG_INHERIT) == 0;
#else
  int flags;
  ASSERT ((flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD)) >= 0);
  return (flags & FD_CLOEXEC) != 0;
#endif
}

/* Return true if FD is in non-blocking mode.  */
static bool
is_nonblocking (int fd)
{
#if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) && ! defined __CYGWIN__
  /* We don't use the non-blocking mode for sockets here.  */
  return 0;
#else
  int flags;
  ASSERT ((flags = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL)) >= 0);
  return (flags & O_NONBLOCK) != 0;
#endif
}

int
main ()
{
  int fd[2];

  fd[0] = -1;
  fd[1] = -1;
  ASSERT (pipe (fd) >= 0);
  ASSERT (fd[0] >= 0);
  ASSERT (fd[1] >= 0);
  ASSERT (fd[0] != fd[1]);
  ASSERT (is_open (fd[0]));
  ASSERT (is_open (fd[1]));
  ASSERT (!is_cloexec (fd[0]));
  ASSERT (!is_cloexec (fd[1]));
  ASSERT (!is_nonblocking (fd[0]));
  ASSERT (!is_nonblocking (fd[1]));

  return 0;
}



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]