[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:40:59 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 12/27/2010 05:20 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> OK, to reduce the runtime cost, here's a new proposed patch. It passes the
> tests on Solaris 10, with and without "-xc99=all".
Yes, thanks, that fixes the performance problem I was worried about,
and it makes sense to install that patch regardless of the other
issues we are talking about.
- linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/26
- Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/27
- Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/12/27
- Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/27
- Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/28
- Re: linkat, LINK_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS, and Solaris, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/27