[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#7948: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#7948: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin |
|
Date: |
Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:51:54 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/02/11 03:29, Bruno Haible wrote:
> - Define a type 'wwchar_t' on all platforms, equivalent to uint32_t
> on Windows platforms and to 'wchar_t' otherwise.
As a minor point, would it be OK to call this type
'xchar_t' instead? 'x' is the successor to 'w', after all,
and it can be thought of as an abbreviation for 'eXtended'.
A problem with the 'ww' prefix is that mentally I start thinking
"World Wide ..."
Re: bug#7948: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin,
Paul Eggert <=
Re: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin, Eric Blake, 2011/02/02
Re: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin, Corinna Vinschen, 2011/02/02