[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies |
Date: |
Mon, 16 May 2011 21:47:20 +0200 |
Hi Pádraig,
* Pádraig Brady wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:44:42PM CEST:
> On 14/05/11 09:07, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> If something treats symlink mtime as significant,
> >> then I suspect that it's at fault.
> >
> > Yes, there's something busted there. GNU 'make' does the right thing:
> > it follows symlinks when checking time stamps. Is some other 'make'
> > is being used, or perhaps some tool other than 'make'?
>
> I suspect something else in the depths of auto* is busted,
> as I'm using standard make.
GNU make, I presume.
Is this issue still open? And if yes, how can it be reproduced?
(Sorry, I haven't been following the thread really, but I still
can't let a non-bug-report without details go uncommented. ;-)
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, (continued)
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Jim Meyering, 2011/05/13
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/14
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Pádraig Brady, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Jim Meyering, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Eric Blake, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Eric Blake, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/16
- Re: bootstrap symlink dependencies, Pádraig Brady, 2011/05/16