bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libvirt] mingw: test-poll pipe part fails


From: Bastien ROUCARIES
Subject: Re: [libvirt] mingw: test-poll pipe part fails
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:54:51 +0200

I have some code if you want that work. If you could test, I wil lsend
you. I have no time to create m4 and proper gnulib integration. It is
up to you

Bastien

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:31:59AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 07/19/2011 09:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >>I'm wondering if the problem here is that libvirt is trying to use the
>> >>pipe-to-self mechanism as a fundamental event loop idiom.  That is, the
>> >>reason libvirt is calling poll is in order to minimize CPU until
>> >>something interesting happens, where interesting includes needing to
>> >>wake up a helper thread to do an action inside locks in response to the
>> >>receipt of a signal.
>> >>
>> >>Maybe you are on to something, and replacing all uses of pipe() with
>> >>virPipeToSelf() (which uses pipe() for efficiency on Linux, but
>> >>socketpair() on mingw), would allow libvirt to continue to use the
>> >>pipe-to-self idiom while also using fds that can actually be poll'd on
>> >>mingw.
>> >
>> >IIRC, we never resolved this for the last release. I think we should
>> >do as you suggest and just use socketpair() on Win32. Given the way
>> >in which libvirt uses these capabilities, I don't think the overheads
>> >of socketpair() vs pipe() are so onerous that we need worry about an
>> >even more fancy Win32 impl or eventfd for linux. Of course if someone
>> >wants todo a full job for gnulib meawhile, we won't complain...
>>
>> Well, right now, we don't even have socketpair() for Win32.  We'd
>> have to wire up some other native APIs for this to work.
>
> Oh I read your mail above as indicating we did have socketpair()
> on Mingw32. A quick look through google, suggests most people
> go down the route of creating a TCP socket bound to localhost
> for this purpose.
>
> Daniel
> --
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]