[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[POLL] C99, declaration after statement
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
[POLL] C99, declaration after statement |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:26:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
All,
Jim Meyering wrote:
> I will then do what I did for a few years with coreutils:
>
> Manually maintain a C99-to-C89 patch for each of the few .c files
> that deserve the effort, like fts.c.
> Then, people who require C89 sources can apply the patch manually.
> Or, who knows... maybe gnulib-tool will be extended to apply the
> patch for them, say when given a --c89 option.
What do the gnulib users think?
Can we have a poll?
1) Is it important for you that what you get from gnulib can be compiled
with a C89 compiler (gcc 2.95, IRIX cc, MSVC)?
2) Is it important for you that gnulib-tool displays information about whether
what you imported from gnulib can be compiled with a C89 compiler?
3) Is it important for you that you can tell gnulib-tool whether it should
accept or reject to import code from gnulib that cannot be compiled with
a C89 compiler?
Please answer in public.
Bruno
--
In memoriam Sara Harpman
<http://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/stamboom-harpman/I399.php>
- Re: [PATCH 8/8] fts: do not exhaust memory when processing million-entry directories, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/22
- Re: [PATCH 8/8] fts: do not exhaust memory when processing million-entry directories, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/24
- Re: C99, declaration after statement, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/24
- Re: C99, declaration after statement, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/24
- [POLL] C99, declaration after statement,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Eric Blake, 2011/09/24
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Pádraig Brady, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/25
- Re: [POLL] C99, declaration after statement, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25