[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gengetopt, anyone?
From: |
Rhys Ulerich |
Subject: |
Re: gengetopt, anyone? |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Oct 2011 20:16:41 -0500 |
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
> I notice no-one mentioned argp. (I also notice one of autoopts's
> testimonials says that it (autoopts) is simpler than argp!). But from
> a quick look argp seems rather neat; it doesn't need a separate parser
> and code generator, and it's available in gnulib.
I very much like argp and have used it in several projects. I find
the amount control possible for --help formatting to be refreshing
compared to many other option processing libraries. I also like
(though have not used) it's ability to provide reusable options
processing building blocks.
- Rhys
- Re: gengetopt, anyone?, Reuben Thomas, 2011/10/01
- Re: gengetopt, anyone?, Bruce Korb, 2011/10/02
- Re: gengetopt, anyone?, Bruno Haible, 2011/10/02
- Re: gengetopt, anyone?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/10/02
- Re: gengetopt, anyone?,
Rhys Ulerich <=