Re: [PATCH] file-has-acl: revert unintended change in behavior of ls -L

[Jim Meyering]

Bruno Haible wrote:

> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I propose to push Kamil's fix (mainly to have a record of it,
>> in case we need it later), but then to immediately revert it
>> along with the file-has-acl.c change that started this.
>> That seems to be the right thing to do, going forward,
>> since the kernel folks have recently reverted the behavior
>> that motivated the earlier file-has-acl.c patch.
>> Any objections?
>
> Fine with me.
>
>>        (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720325#c24)
>
> Good to see that the kernel people are considering the issue seriously.
> Thanks, Kamil, for having pulled Ian Kent into the discussion.

Thanks for the feedback, Bruno.  I've pushed that to gnulib.