[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:01:20 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Eric Blake wrote:
> I wonder if we should refactor the code to share common features
> between test-ptsname{,_r}.c into test-ptsname.h.
Is it possible to do this refactoring in a way that the line number
printed by the ASSERT macro is informative enough? I mean, on some
platforms I don't have a decently working 'gdb', and often people
report just the output of "make check".
Bruno
--
In memoriam Robert Blum <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Blum>
- [PATCH 0/4] add ptsname_r, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07
- [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/08
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Eric Blake, 2011/11/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, Eric Blake, 2011/11/10
[PATCH 4/4] ptsname_r: work around FreeBSD issue, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07
[PATCH 3/4] ptsname_r: port to Solaris, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07