Re: musl printf bugs

[Rich Felker]

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Rich Felker wrote:
> > considering printf broken, and replacing printf
> > because of this, is a big issue. Replacing printf is non-trivial
> 
> There is also another test that causes musl's printf to be overridden:
> 
>   checking whether printf supports the 'ls' directive... no

Yep, I caught this one a while back. It's fixed in git. %ls was
over-reading (not over-printing, just over-reading) by one wchar_t
when precision was specified, and if that extra wchar_t happened to be
invalid, it would bail with EILSEQ.

Rich