[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gnulib-tool and --with-tests
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
gnulib-tool and --with-tests |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:37:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> $ ./gnulib-tool --test --with-tests parse-duration
Using '--test --with-tests' or '--create-testdir --with-tests' is quite
common. Is there any reason why --with-tests isn't the default? It
seems rare to want to test a module without also wanting to include its
self-tests. Naively, it also seems surprising that '--test' and
'-create-testdir' does not bring in self-*tests*.
What do you think of making --with-tests a no-op, and add a
--without-tests to disable it? This would save us all some typing...
I haven't looked into the gnulib-tool changes at all so I don't know how
difficult it would be to implement.
/Simon
- parse-duration test output, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/20
- Re: parse-duration test output, Bruce Korb, 2012/06/20
- gnulib-tool and --with-tests,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Dmitriy Selyutin, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Dmitriy Selyutin, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/21
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/06/22
- Re: gnulib-tool and --with-tests, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/22