[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not memmo
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not memmove |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:43:14 +0200 |
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 12:21 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> While investigating the rm-vs-slash-decorated-symlink-to-dir problem,
>> I noticed this:
>>
>> From 9322cc5db3a6efe4c19f274512a28767872384e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:31:09 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not
>> memmove
>>
>> * lib/fts.c (fts_alloc): Fix unjustified memcopy: s/memmove/memcpy/
>>
> Shouldn't it read "Fix unjustified memmove"?
Yes, thanks.