[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory Leaks
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Memory Leaks |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:28 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 06/01/2014 12:39 AM, Geoff wrote:
> I am (would be) _very_ happy - ecstatic even - about my present situation. My
> concern is one regarding certain memory leaks I found I could not avoid with
> regard to parent processes. I had hoped to limit the page tables accessed by
> these parent processes; although it appears I may not have fully done the
> best I could with regard to this. But by personal opinion is that it should
> not pose a critical security issue.
>
> Instead, I seem to be reading in the documentation much more to the effect of
> “bugs are normal”. This I get. I can work out my bugs. What I’m unclear about
> is whether these leaks are/were sufficient such that management feels this
> program is no longer viable...?
Your mail is missing some context. I have no idea _which_ program you
are complaining about, or if there is a pointer to an earlier email
thread that has more background on the subject. Are you reporting a bug
against gnulib?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Memory Leaks, Geoff, 2014/06/01
- Re: Memory Leaks,
Eric Blake <=