|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 18/21] Workaround for dirfd() on OS/2 kLIBC |
Date: | Sun, 30 Nov 2014 14:48:13 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
KO Myung-Hun wrote:
* lib/fts.c (fts_build): Do not check dir_fd on OS/2 kLIBC.
I'm afraid this change needs more explanation. If the problem is that dirfd returns -2, the earlier part of fts_build will return when that happens, so that problem cannot be fixed by the patch that you sent.
What actually goes wrong if the change is omitted?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |