[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
|
From: |
Siddhesh Poyarekar |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919] |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:37:40 +0530 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:25:18AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This sounds a bit like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308427 "s390
> memcheck reports tsearch conditional jump or move depends on
> uninitialized value". But that bug got fixed some time ago and should
> not be in the latest version of valgrind. It does contain a nice
> description of how best to report such an issue.
I've filed:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343802
which is a variant of 308427, which fixes the lg+jhe combination, but
not the lt+jl combination which the newer gcc produces.
Siddhesh
pgpAsD7MK4glo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2015/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], Andreas Schwab, 2015/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], Carlos O'Donell, 2015/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], Carlos O'Donell, 2015/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], Carlos O'Donell, 2015/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919], Mark Wielaard, 2015/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919],
Siddhesh Poyarekar <=