Re: secure_getenv + windows

[Paul Eggert]

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> secure_getenv()
> has no (known to me) meaning for windows, and that's why I'd expect
> that call there to behave as getenv().

I'm afraid that this doesn't answer my question. I was asking why the behavior 
you expect would be more useful in practice than Gnulib's current behavior. (If 
secure_getenv has no known meaning for MS-Windows, then any implementation of it 
should be "correct" and there should be no reason to change from the current 
behavior. :-)