Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int

From:	Paul Eggert
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int
Date:	Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:18:42 -0700
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

Thanks for the heads-up. That code has long been on my list of things to cleanup, and your message prompted me to go about it. I installed the attached, whichfixes the runtime problem corresponding to the diagnostic you mentioned, alongwith a lot of other problems. Please give it a try. I hope that your clang issmart enough not to complain about expressions like abs (x % 60) merely becausex's data type is wider than int.

0001-parse-datetime-overflow-and-debug-cleanups.txt
Description: Text document

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Ruediger Meier, 2017/04/07
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Paul Eggert <=
  - Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Rüdiger Meier, 2017/04/22
  - Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Pádraig Brady, 2017/04/22
    - Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/22
    - Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/24
    - Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Tim Rice, 2017/04/26
    - Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/27
    - Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Tim Rice, 2017/04/27
    - Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Bruno Haible, 2017/04/27
  - Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Pádraig Brady, 2017/04/22

Prev by Date: Re: Trivial patches to silence -Wundef
Next by Date: Re: %a format in tests-ulc*.c
Previous by thread: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread