[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:43:04 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 22/04/17 02:18, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up. That code has long been on my list of things to
> clean
FYI I'm currently running date(1) with this change
+ ASAN enabled, through the latest AFL fuzzer,
seeded with the coreutils test corpus.
- [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Ruediger Meier, 2017/04/07
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/22
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Rüdiger Meier, 2017/04/22
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Pádraig Brady, 2017/04/22
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/22
- Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/24
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Tim Rice, 2017/04/26
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/27
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Tim Rice, 2017/04/27
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Bruno Haible, 2017/04/27
Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int,
Pádraig Brady <=