Re: latest gcc vs lib/timespec.h:85

[Paul Eggert]

Jim Meyering wrote:
> Here's a proposed patch:

I prefer 'assume' to 'assure' here, since it's a low-level time-comparison 
primitive and lots of other code in the module already silently assumes that the 
timestamps are valid. Also, while I was in the neighborhood I noticed that the 
cast is no longer needed, since the module provokes -Wconversion warnings in 
several other places now (and I expect nobody notices because nobody looks at 
those warnings any more). So I installed the attached followup.

0001-timespec-prefer-assume-to-assure.txt
Description: Text document