Re: Problems with/questions about GNUstep-Startup 0.18.1

[Adam Fedor]

On Jun 18, 2007, at 1:42 PM, James Mahoney wrote:

> 1. This is minor, but the install script gives warnings W102 and W109
> telling me my make version is not recent enough [W102] and that make
> will not pass along the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and I should be root to  
> install
> [W109].  At line 32 in 00-config-output.log I get this:
>
>         checking make version >
>         3.75... /home/james/Desktop/gnustep-startup-0.18.1/configure:
>         line 3762: --version: command not found
>         no

That is a bug. Thanks.


>         checking broken make... broken
[...]
> As for the W109 which tells me to use sudo or to be root, I have  
> run the
> InstallGNUstep script both with sudo and as root, and still get the  
> W109
> warning.  Is this warning related to W102, given that "make --version"
> is not being run by the script that is checking the versions and
> functionality of everything?
No, it's not related to W102, and you would get W109 regardless of if  
you are running as root or not. make is still broken on your system,  
even when running as root. This just is a reminder that you would  
still need to run as root.



> 2. The InstallGNUstep script will ignore these problems with make and
> proceeds to tell me that I am ready to install GNUstep etc.  It prints
> this list:
>
>         This package installs these versions of the GNUstep libraries:
>           GNUstep Make: 2.0.1
>           GNUstep Base: 1.14.0
>           GNUstep Gui: 0.12.0
> I am wondering why GNUstep Back is not included in this list.  It  
> seems
> fruitless to go through with the installation if GNUstep Back will be
> entirely missing.  I am attaching the log files from the build

Back is not printed, but it is installed.  It's essentially part of  
GNUstep GUI - it's the same version at least.