Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat browser default on Windows 7?

[Daniel Quintiliani]

Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right?

--

-Dan Q


On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis Garcia <address@hidden> wrote:

> People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have
> IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable.
> Any freedom and security enhancement they ask for, it's to GNU/Linux
> direction.
> 
> 
> El 29/12/16 a les 23:58, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
> > I think there's been a real problem lately where complaints by users are 
> > being confused with official project decisions. Like when v45.5 and v45.3 
> > were released Linux only, some of us asked if a Windows version would be 
> > available, and it turned into arguments about whether we should expand 
> > non-DRM browsers under unfree systems. Instead of arguments we need to 
> > focus on the project and official policy vs mailing list opinions. We 
> > should also focus on who the decision makers actually are, to my knowledge 
> > Ruben has been busy lately but someone can easily say "Why should we 
> > maintain a Windows or Mac version of IceCat?" and be confused for someone 
> > who is making decisions for the project.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:03:32 -0800, Gary Driggs <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> >> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ruben having discontinued Windows support for IceCat was the best and 
> >>> easiest way to force most of the human population into DRM.
> >>
> >> Where did you see any such announcement?
> >>
> >> Maybe we should start an alternate mailing list, address@hidden, so the 
> >> rest of us can discuss technical topics in peace.
> >> --
> >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
> > 
> 
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org