[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-grep] C or C++? [was: search.c clean-up]
From: |
Tim Waugh |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-grep] C or C++? [was: search.c clean-up] |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:41:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:11:52PM -0400, Tony Abou-Assaleh wrote:
> I think the choice of C vs. C++ is more of a matter of preference than
> anything else. Though, in some cases, it may also depend on your
> objectives.
For short-lived applications where time is of the essence or where
they are used frequently, start-up time becomes important. I believe
that grep may very well fall into this category.
On the system I'm using, compiling a trivial program as C++ rather
than C produces a binary that has 3 extra dynamic load-time
dependencies. I just performed some timings and they do indeed show a
significant hit to start-up-and-exit just from switching from C to
C++.
(Of course, prelinking can help to some extent.)
Tim.
*/
pgpf6V0XcuUuz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, (continued)
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/23
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Elliott Hughes, 2004/11/23
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/23
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Elliott Hughes, 2004/11/24
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/24
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Elliott Hughes, 2004/11/24
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/24
Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Aharon Robbins, 2004/11/24
Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/26