bug-grep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1.7] BUG - GREP slows to a crawl with large number of matches on a


From: Thomas Wolff
Subject: Re: 1.7] BUG - GREP slows to a crawl with large number of matches on a single file
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:39:46 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

[forgot to CC to bug-grep before, so I'm resending this, with one more comment, and leaving out cygwin-specific parts]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov  6 16:00, Thomas Wolff wrote:
...
I extended your test program to demonstrate the inefficiency of the
standard mbrtowc function. [...]
I later had to correct:
Anyway, corrected results are still by a factor of 3 to 4 in favor of my algorithm.
Corinna wrote:
That's sort of an unfair test.  Your utftouni function doesn't care for
mbstate, error, and surrogate pair handling.
This is a question of use cases:
* mbstate is needed e.g. if you feed results of read() which possibly come in arbitrary chunks directly into mbtowc(); it's not needed if you only transform complete lines of text at once. The stdlib function is a little bit too generic (and thus complicated, too) for many applications. * error handling is there, in my function; it's simplified, incorrect sequences are all mapped to 0 for the test case but they could as well return an error indication without performance impact. * surrogate pair handling is only needed if you pass the string from/to the Windows API. It's not needed for POSIX applications (provided wchar_t would be sufficiently wide). So if wchar_t can be extended in the newlib API, it might be useful to have two implementations; one for applications (w/o surrogates), one for cygwin itself.


[...]

My main point was that, depending on the use case, some applications would be better off using less generic, optimized functions. The kind of dogmatic suggestion (as seen in the "locale scene") that everybody should use the stdlib wide character functions is often misleading.
grep and sed would certainly be well advised to change that.

Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]