bug#15192: UTF-16 surrogate pair handling in grep -i option

[Jim Meyering]

Hi Corinna,
Sorry about the delay.
I'm prepared to push the following.  Are you ok with that?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Aug 26 21:58, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I guess it is a different point of view.  Maybe I'm just too
>> forward-thinking? :-)
>> I.e., if the remaining cygwin-specific bug is fixed soon, there will
>> be little reason for separate tests.
>> Are you planning to work on the cygwin/regexp bug?
>
> Not in the next couple of weeks.  I'll be abroad for a while.  Maybe in
> October or November.  I put it on my TODO list.  The biggest problem is
> that I know the BSD regex code pretty well, but the gnulib regex code is
> very different.  I already had a look two weeks ago, but I have not
> found the right place to mount surrogate pairs into it :(
>
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat

k.txt
Description: Text document