bug#18580: [PATCH] dfa: check end of an input buffer after a transition in non-UTF8 multibyte locales

[Norihiro Tanaka]

Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> If you don't want your name on it, let me know.
> I listed you as the author mainly for the comment.
> I too would have preferred an inline function, but feel that the number
> of parameters would be too large. Think of this as a stopgap
> measure to avoid risk of divergence in those two blocks of code.

I agree.  I also think that the number of parameters would be too large
by using inline functions forcely.  As a result, I think your fix is
better.  Could you push it?