[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Serial Line boot may not properly clear the screen
From: |
Christoph Plattner |
Subject: |
Re: Serial Line boot may not properly clear the screen |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:49:50 +0100 |
Hello !
No at the moment Klaus and I keep the command line interface (this
was the status of Thursday). In `emacs' it does not look very good
at the moment (especially the amount of `^H' to blank the line, but
in "emergency" cases, `emacs' can be used. You can send amount of
`^H' or better a `^A^K' and use `emacs' editing features to paste
in a new line.
But of course, this is not the final editing method we want. It is
a question of time, idea and design to change this ...
Controlling the line editiong by `expect' is possible with the
current implementation of GRUB, I have tested it.
If I have time, I will play around with a new version of emacs, as
some chnages of the new version may affect our design also.
I do not like to "throw away" the current feature of the command line,
so I hope we find a method as Klaus in the new dumb menu, to hold
all editing functions, but also to have a good interface to cannonical
terminals.
With friendly regards
Christoph P.
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" wrote:
>
> At Sat, 19 Jan 2002 00:32:31 +0900,
> Yoshinori K. Okuji <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Ok, I'll do that. As I already know what's wrong thanks to your
> > report, I don't think it would be difficult to fix the problem.
>
> Hmm. I think my estimation was too optimistic again. I know how I
> should fix the problem, but that requires substantial changes in the
> code. So I keep that pending for a while.
>
> BTW, I noticed that your previous change made it nearly meaningless to
> handle a dumb terminal in get_cmdline. The reason why I rewrote
> get_cmdline was that it should be functional even with dumb
> terminals. So...
>
> Is it necessary to stick to the current implementation of get_cmdline?
> I guess you disabled the command-line editing in the case of a dumb
> terminal, because Emacs has its own editing feature and it is available
> before sending inputs to GRUB. Generally speaking, is this a good
> assumption for dumb terminals?
>
> Okuji
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-grub mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--
-------------------------------------------------------
private: address@hidden
company: address@hidden