[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BugCommunicator as a GRUB BTS
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: BugCommunicator as a GRUB BTS |
Date: |
29 Oct 2002 10:19:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 |
> IMHO, if the design of a software package sucks, it isn't worth
> improving, even if the implementation is elegant, beautiful, simple,
> and smart. Especially when the goal is different from yours, there is
> no point where you can contribute.
>
> That's why I started BugCommunicator. I surveyed some famous projects
> before starting and concluded that no project would satisfy my
> needs. Sicne it is critical for us to have a good BTS, I believe that
> I didn't waste my time.
I certainly appreciate these arguments, however, I would appreciate it
(as I think would others) if you could briefly enumerate what
separates bugcomm from the others. That is, which design issues does
bugcomm try to correct; just calling it better does not mean anything
without arguments for why it is so.
Thanks.