[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gsl] Correction: gsl_wavelet2d.h (was: gsl_wavelet.h) declares miss
From: |
Alex Tartakovsky |
Subject: |
[Bug-gsl] Correction: gsl_wavelet2d.h (was: gsl_wavelet.h) declares missing functions |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:22:57 -0700 (PDT) |
This report applies to gsl_wavelet2d.h rather than gsl_wavelet.h. Sorry for any
confusion.
Alex Tartakovsky <address@hidden> wrote:Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:13:35 -0700
(PDT)
From: Alex Tartakovsky <address@hidden>
Subject: gsl_wavelet.h declares missing functions
To: address@hidden
gsl_wavelet.h declares functions gsl_wavelet2d_transform_forward,
gsl_wavelet2d_transform_inverse, gsl_wavelet2d_nstransform_forward, and
gsl_wavelet2d_nstransform_inverse. These functions are also documented in the
manual (pp. 309, 310). However, no implementations are given in dwt.c.
Granted these functions are trivial as they should simply set the
gsl_wavelet_direction argument in the call to the base functions, they still
managed to go AWOL in two versions already. Note that test.c does not test
those functions either.
As a general note, it's all too easy to have a missing function, since a
declaration without implementation does not usually generate an error. I
already reported missing GSL functions in the past; my way of finding those is
to compile a windows dll using a def file. I dump all functions declared in
include files into a def file; any unimplemented function will generate an
error at this point (at least, that's how it works in MSVC).
Regards,
Alex Tartakovsky
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- [Bug-gsl] Correction: gsl_wavelet2d.h (was: gsl_wavelet.h) declares missing functions,
Alex Tartakovsky <=