Re: [Bug-gsl] Question on version 2.3 test outputs

[aweatherguy]

Thanks for the reply! I will ignore those outputs.

Cheers,


On 12/14/2016 9:44 AM, Patrick Alken wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the report. These arent serious failures so you can use
> the library safely. I will adjust the tests so hopefully they will pass
> for you in the future
>
> On 12/12/2016 12:55 AM, Weber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just was trying out the new GSL 2.3 release and am seeing some test
> > failures. I've included the output from these tests below. Here are
> > the specifics:
> >
> > Hardware: Desktop PC, Intel Core i7 (6-cores), 24GB RAM.
> >
> > OS: Windows 7 64-bit
> >
> > GSL Builds: Cygwin (32-bit), native Windows (32-bit and 64-bit).
> >
> > These are local builds -- not binaries downloaded from the internet.
> > Which test fails depends on whether the build is 32 or 64-bit bits --
> > the same test fails with both the 32-bit Cygwin and 32-bit native
> > Windows builds.
> >
> > The 64-bit build fails the multifit test, and the 32-bit builds fail
> > the multifit_nlinear test. All of the other tests (forty-something of
> > them) are passing. I have given no command line options to any of the
> > tests -- don't know if that's required or not.
> >
> > I also have similar working builds of GSL versions 1.8, 2.0, 2.1 and
> > 2.2 -- no test failures with them.
> >
> > Let me know if that's not enough information. I have working Debug
> > builds for both 32 and 64-bit native Windows so I can set breakpoints
> > and all that stuff if it would help for me to do any looking.
> >
> > -- aweatherguy --
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > ======== GSL 2.3 x64 Build (Win7 native) ==============
> >
> > Starting test-multifit...
> > FAIL: shaw gcv: n=20 p=20 lambda (1.2492178093196711e-005 observed vs
> > 1.2492178094905104e-005 expected) [21908]
> > GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,round-to-nearest,mask-all"
> >
> > ======= GSL 2.3 x86 Build  (Win7 native) ==============
> >
> > Starting test-multifit_nlinear...
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [39959]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/weighted/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [39963]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [40457]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/weighted/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [40461]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [42066]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/weighted/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [42070]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [42564]
> > FAIL:
> > trust-region/levenberg-marquardt+accel/scale=more/solver=svd/fdfvv/weighted/box3d
> > did not converge, status=exceeded max number of iterations [42568]
> > GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,round-to-nearest,mask-all"
> > trs = levenberg-marquardt
> > solver = cholesky
> > solver = qr
> > solver = svd
> > trs = levenberg-marquardt+accel
> > solver = cholesky
> > solver = qr
> > solver = svd
> > trs = dogleg
> > solver = cholesky
> > solver = qr
> > solver = svd
> > trs = double-dogleg
> > solver = cholesky
> > solver = qr
> > solver = svd
> > trs = 2D-subspace
> > solver = cholesky
> > solver = qr
> > solver = svd