[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: build error on solaris
From: |
Alexander Klimov |
Subject: |
Re: build error on solaris |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:25:27 +0200 (IST) |
Hi.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> But, relax. The problem with these errors is, that they only occur
> because you did not make install yet. In fact, they should work before
> you do make install, but surprisingly they don't. I guess the reason is,
> that the documentation files are only looked for at the places where they
> end after installation.
I run `make install' and then `make check' again -- results better, but
there are 6 failures left.
with GUILE_LOAD_PATH: /export/home/ask/build/guile-core
FAIL: bit-operations.test: bit-extract: documented?
FAIL: list.test: append!: documented?
FAIL: list.test: list-ref: documented?
FAIL: list.test: list-set!: documented?
FAIL: list.test: list-cdr-set!: documented?
FAIL: numbers.test: exact?: documented?
Totals for this test run:
passes: 1565
failures: 6
unexpected passes: 0
expected failures: 17
unresolved test cases: 0
untested test cases: 0
unsupported test cases: 9
errors: 0
Regards,
ASK
- build error on solaris, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/03/09
- Re: build error on solaris, Gary Houston, 2001/03/09
- Re: build error on solaris, Alexander Klimov, 2001/03/11
- Re: build error on solaris, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/03/12
- Re: build error on solaris, Alexander Klimov, 2001/03/12
- Re: build error on solaris, Alexander Klimov, 2001/03/12
- Documentation with GCC3.1, (was: build error on solaris), Alexander Klimov, 2001/03/14
- Re: Documentation with GCC3.1, (was: build error on solaris), Neil Jerram, 2001/03/21
- Re: Documentation with GCC3.1, (was: build error on solaris), Neil Jerram, 2001/03/23
- Re: Documentation with GCC3.1, (was: build error on solaris), Martin Grabmueller, 2001/03/23
- Re: Documentation with GCC3.1, (was: build error on solaris), Neil Jerram, 2001/03/24