[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fix for _Complex_I problems
|
From: |
Neil Jerram |
|
Subject: |
Re: Fix for _Complex_I problems |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:07:10 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
> Adding a remedial
>
> #define _Complex_I 1.0fi
>
> to the beginning of numbers.c if _Complex_I weren't defined would seem
> less objectionable, and also work.
Just one detail for the record: unfortunately that wouldn't work for
GCC on AIX, because there:
- complex.h does define _Complex_I: #define _Complex_I __I
- the AIX compiler provides __I, so complex.h works with the AIX
compiler
- GCC does not provide __I, so the setup doesn't work with GCC (but
`#ifdef _Complex_I' is still true)
Regards,
Neil