Re: stack overflow / partial success

[Rainer Tammer]

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
>   
>
> > > So what does "grep inline config.log" show?!
> > >
> > >       
> > There is a "inline" but this version is not compatible...
> >     
>
> Note that this does not answer my question.  :-)
>
>   
I know...
> > The "inline" produces the following error:
> >
> > "strings.c", line 132.10: 1506-780 (S) Reference to "scm_double_cell"
> > with internal linkage is not allowed within inline definition of
> > "scm_i_take_stringbufn".
> >     
>
> Yes, this is fixed in the forthcoming 1.8.4 (hopefully released later
> today).
>
>   
This sounds great, then it should work without the __inline__ hack.
> > /* Define to 1 if you have the `hstrerror' function. */
> > #define HAVE_HSTRERROR 1
> >     
>
> Then you should only get a warning at compilation-time about
> `hstrerror ()' being undeclared, but the build process should continue
> and Guile should link fine.
>
> I'm reluctant to adding a `#define _USE_IRS' without any compelling
> reason, since (i) the leading underscore makes it look like an internal
> macro, and (ii) I don't know what it's really supposed to do.
>
>   
Yes and no,
IBM XL C/C++ continues but gcc 4.2.2 stops due to the -Wall switch...

gmake[3]: Entering directory `/daten/source/guile-1.8.3/libguile'
/usr/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H 
-I. -I.. -I.. -I..    -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Werror -MT net_db.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/net_db.Tpo -c -o net_db.lo net_db.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -MT net_db.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/net_db.Tpo 
-c net_db.c  -DPIC -o .libs/net_db.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
net_db.c: In function 'scm_resolv_error':
net_db.c:112: warning: implicit declaration of function 'hstrerror'

The easiest solution wold be an AIX note in the INSTALL:

n.1. AIX with IBM Compiler
...

n.2. AIX with gcc 4.x
...

and the setting for the extended stack "(debug-set! stack 80000)" should 
also be mention.
> Thanks,
> Ludovic.
>
>
>   
Bye
 Rainer