[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-pub
From: |
Ian Price |
Subject: |
bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 22:37:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Court$(D+2(Bs) writes:
> Should really be $B!H(BGuile 2.0$B!I(B and $B!H(BGuile$B!I(B, with a
> capital $B!F(BG$B!G(B, when
> talking about the package.
Ah, of course. Fixed and Pushed.
Thanks David for the report, I'm marking this as done.
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/09/03
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ian Price, 2012/09/04
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/09/05
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ian Price, 2012/09/06
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/09/06
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does,
Ian Price <=