[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Literate programming
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: Literate programming |
|
Date: |
Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:52:08 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden> skribis:
> What do you think about literate programming [1,2,3]?
I don’t think it’s appropriate here. We have (or should have) user doc
for command-line tools, a manual for the API, as well as an on-line
reference in the form of docstrings; the code itself is reasonably
commented, I think, and in a functional style that hopefully simplifies
reasoning a bit (I know there’s more to it than just writing functional
code, but still, it’s better than TeX macros ;-)).
WDYT?
Ludo’.