|
| From: | Andreas Enge |
| Subject: | Re: Required packages |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:09:23 +0100 |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
|
Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > For GCC, the situation is more complicated, because GCC has a loose tie > to Binutils and libc. For instance, it happily takes whichever ‘ld’ > program is in $PATH. It’s more closely tied to libc, though, because we > explicitly patch its spec strings to refer to it; so at least libc > should be a propagated input of GCC.
Sounds good to me.
Andreas
|
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |