Re: Guile reader package names are problematic

[Ludovic Courtès]

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:

> In commit d9d466ddff2091f4b1f94599335b5947a17def2c, you added the
> following packages:
>
>   guile-reader-for-guile-1.8.8
>   guile-reader-for-guile-2.0.7
>
> The "1.8.8" and "2.0.7" are actually part of the package names (both of
> these packages are at version 0.6).

Yes, the ‘guile-reader’ procedure was mostly added for illustrative
reasons, at the beginning.

In today’s real world, I would just get rid of the one for 1.8, and keep
only the one for 2.0.  Someone really wanting 1.8 can still inherit from
the other one and just change the “guile” input.

Would you like to change that?

Ludo’.