[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Toward 0.2
|
From: |
Nikita Karetnikov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Toward 0.2 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:55 -0500 |
> With the recently-added ‘package-output’ (singular):
> scheme@(guile-user)> (package-output s binutils "out")
> $2 = "/nix/store/bfh5c2a4is27jdmc811fp6g0jfac7fiw-binutils-2.22"
> scheme@(guile-user)> (package-output s binutils "lib")
> $3 = "/nix/store/n29brzqlhjkzww51labk9anx493gl4d3-binutils-2.22-lib"
What's the value of 's' here? There is no explanation in the docstrings
of 'package-derivation', 'package-cross-derivation', and
'package-output'.
Are you sure that it's OK to have 'package-output' and 'package-outputs'
in the same module? Can we rename one?
pgpdbuRp4L4rD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Toward 0.2, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/17
- Re: Toward 0.2, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/02/17
- Re: Toward 0.2, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/18
- Re: Toward 0.2, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/02/19
- Re: Toward 0.2, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/20
- Re: Toward 0.2,
Nikita Karetnikov <=
- Re: Toward 0.2, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/22
- Re: Toward 0.2, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/02/26
- Re: Toward 0.2, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/26
- Re: Toward 0.2, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/26
- Re: Toward 0.2, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/02/28
Re: Toward 0.2, Andreas Enge, 2013/02/20