Re: New “guix pull” command

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:

> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Can you run
>>   guix build /nix/store/7pp5x6b3ikz6vnvrdlr836bjp4sbgbg8-guix-latest.drv
>> and post the log?
>
> Unpacking og guix-0.2, then:

[...]

>    ?: 3 [module-variable #<directory (guix build download) 3243e10> make-
> session]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2732: 2 [b #<autoload (gnutls) 350b870> make-session #f]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 1 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  106: 0 [#<procedure 2a4e280 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)> 
> misc-error ...]
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #<procedure 2a4e280 at 
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: missing interface for module (gnutls)

I believe this is fixed by 7b50c68 (which is like 855a8ad).
Can you confirm?

(Note how the file system introduces non-determinism in a way that can
have a concrete effect: the bug above would show up only if
guix/build/download.scm wasn’t built when guix/scripts/download.scm was
compiled, which depends on the order in which files were traversed.)

Ludo’.