[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix paper
From: |
Nikita Karetnikov |
Subject: |
Re: Guix paper |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2013 22:25:31 +0400 |
> I’ve pushed the paper under the new guix/maintenance.git repository
> [0].
I've spotted some typos.
> (p [This section describe the functional package management
> paradigm and its implementation in Nix. It then shows how Guix differs,
> and what the rationale is.])
The word "describe" should be changed to "describes."
> (p [Our goals when designing Guix was to provide interfaces
> ranging from Nix's low-level primitives such as ,(tt
> [derivation]) to high-level package declarations.
"Our goal" instead of "our goals."
> Input file names are similarly reified through the ,(tt [%build-inputs])
> variable (not shown here.)
Change to "variable (not shown here)."
> As an additional constraint, this extra layer should be efficient in
> space and time: package management tools need to be able to load and
> traverse a distribution consisting in thousands of packages.])
Replace "consisting in" with "consisting of."
pgpZEF4zM7ecY.pgp
Description: PGP signature