bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#22274: GuixSD resets hardware clock (on Lenovo x200 with libreboot)


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#22274: GuixSD resets hardware clock (on Lenovo x200 with libreboot)
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:08:39 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:

> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>
>>>> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> From e60db83ffff23c57ec5c44de7c99cee8e4e353ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:34:25 -0800
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add linux-libre-4.2.5
>>>>>
>>>>> This older version of linux-libre is being added because it was found
>>>>> that newer versions (or at least 4.3.3) of linux-libre were not reading
>>>>> the hardware clock on (at least Libreboot-enabled) Thinkpad x200
>>>>> machines.
>>>>>
>>>>> * gnu/linux.scm (linux-libre-4.2.5): New variable.
>>>>
>>>> I would say that the variable should be named 'linux-libre-4.2', which
>>>> would always be bound to the latest 4.2.x.  However, there's another
>>>> problem: the 4.2 branch is no longer supported upstream, so it will no
>>>> longer receive security updates and other important fixes.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest that we instead add linux-libre-4.1, which is still supported
>>>> upstream and is designated as an LTS branch.  Would that be okay?
>>>
>>> If it works for Christopher, that’s a good idea.
>>
>> Fine by me, assuming it works.  I can test it works fine probably tomorrow.
>
> I just added a 'linux-libre-4.1' variable.  Can you test to make sure it
> works for you?  I'd like to remove linux-libre-4.2.5 ASAP because 4.2.x
> is no longer supported upstream and contains security flaws.

Regardless, it seems that this bug can be closed on the Guix side; WDYT?

Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]