bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#26987: [PATCH 2/2] build: pull: Fix compilation list construction.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#26987: [PATCH 2/2] build: pull: Fix compilation list construction.
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 17:09:47 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi Mathieu,

Mathieu Othacehe <address@hidden> skribis:

>> I believe this is fixed by commit
>> 20ed093977cc80ba1729c38e05ae7955a38069a6, which follows a modification
>> to the ‘source-module-closure’ so that callers can catch
>> missing-dependency errors.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think!
>
> It seems ok, thanks for fixing it !
>
>>
>> After that, you should be able to reinstate the (guix git) commit,
>> provided build-aux/build-self.scm does:
>>
>>   (define guile-git
>>     (package-for-current-guile "guile-git"
>>                                "guile2.2-git"
>>                                "guile2.0-git"))
>                                         ^
>                            for guile2.0-git,
> we need to define guile2.0-bytestructures, so I tried to package it,
> and I get the following error :
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: In procedure #<procedure 9dbe40 at 
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:100:6 (thrown-k . 
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: re-exporting local variable: cstring-pointer
>
> It is something introduced in bytestructures commit 91d042e, that works
> on 2.2 but not on 2.0, I have no idea why !

It would be nice to have guile2.0-git, but note that it does not *have*
to exist: ‘package-for-current-guile’ returns #f if none of the packages
exists, and (guix build pull) skips modules that lack their
dependencies.

So I would first suggest to re-add (guix git), and later see with
Amirouche et al. what could be done to get Guile-Git on 2.0.

Does that make sense?

Thanks,
Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]