[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:40:41 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > ----- Forwarded message -----
> > >
> > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > > > To: ng0
> > > > Cc: address@hidden
> > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals.
> > > >
> > > > md5sum
> > > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > >
> > > > sha1sum
> > > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959
> > > > libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > >
> > > > Local file time stamps are
> > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > >
> > > > That values equals on sourceforge.net.
> > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/
> > > >
> > > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > ---
> > > > address@hidden
> >
> > Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs
> > ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share?
>
> Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout
> and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure
> when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28.
>
> But I think I found our problem:
>
> address@hidden ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> address@hidden ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz
> 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
>
> (inputs
> `(("apng" ,(origin
> (method url-fetch)
> (uri
> (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/"
> version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz"))
> (sha256
> (base32
> "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5"))))))
>
> My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
> libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
> inherits its version.
>
> I don't have the time to look at our git history right now,
> but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched
> since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng.
>
git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from
1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back
in January.
commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f
--
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature