[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-hurd] Re: defining _POSIX_SYNCHRONOUS_IO although msync not ava
|
From: |
Roland McGrath |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-hurd] Re: defining _POSIX_SYNCHRONOUS_IO although msync not available? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:35:44 -0400 (EDT) |
> So we probably have to give in. The apt author (Jason Gunthorpe) is not
> happy about a special configure check for that on the Hurd (quote: "I really
> hate adding more configure tests"), and the code is correct in any way.[1]
I have no problem with that. We should not claim to conform to things we
don'te rally conform to.
> Do we do report the correct things with sysconf (resp fsync et al)?
sysconf just returns what the macro definitions are.
We should and do define _POSIX_FSYNC.