[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs |
Date: |
Wed, 2 May 2001 04:03:44 -0400 (EDT) |
> types, and the C type "int" on Alpha is a 64 bit type.
That's not true.
> It would be better if we dropped the C type "int" entirely, and
> changed to using the MiG type "int32" or "int64", which can then have
> C typedefs to the right native types, and the whole thing would be
> clearer.
That's still true, but the fact that C int is in fact still 32 bits on the
64-bit platforms (long int is 64 bits) means that it doesn't really matter
in practice.
- [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/01
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/01
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Erik Verbruggen, 2001/05/02
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/03
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/04
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/04
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/07
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/07