[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kernel command line
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: kernel command line |
Date: |
15 May 2001 15:03:04 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Roland McGrath <roland@gnu.org> writes:
> > * Mach needs a facility to find out what task is the parent of
> > a given task.
>
> I'm not sure if there was a particular motivation for this other than the
> kind of thing in proc that I suggested.
Also a process accounting motivation here too.
> We seem to be thinking the same things. This is indeed the problem with
> the straightforward feature using the task ports. As I understand it, you
> cannot transfer a dead name--it is not a port any longer. A dead name is
> just a placeholder in the task's port name space preventing that name from
> being reused for a different port right until the user refs are all gone.
That's correct, but in the model of just "return null if the parent is
gone", why is this a problem?
- kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/04
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/04
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/05
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/06
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/06
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/07
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/08
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/14
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/14
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15