[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc broken
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: glibc broken |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2001 12:38:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:04:54PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> It is important to be clear about what works and what doesn't:
>
> * statically linked user programs
> * statically linked user programs that use cthreads
I don't see how a statically linked program can be affected by a glibc
upgrade. Note that I didn't recompile the Hurd with the new glibc.
> Also test whether running a program via ld.so works,
> i.e. /lib/ld.so.1 /bin/foo arg1 arg2
>
> This is how exec gets run. Try /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec --help.
I believe I did this and it worked, but I will try again.
> As to debugging a hurd boot problem, is there a reason you haven't done
> this under a sub-hurd and given more detailed information?
Only lack of time. That's the next step.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
- glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/22
- Re: glibc broken, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/22
- Re: glibc broken,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/24
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/25
Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/23