[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 02:21:13 -0500 (EST) |
> An alternative strategy (for the dynamic case) is to have the client
> hand a port for the file to the console server, which can then read
> from it exactly as if it were a file (which it normally will be).
Yeah, maybe. But that is certainly more of a burden on the server to stay
robust that just handing it the data directly.
> In the passive translator case, it's perfectly fine for it to read
> from the filesystem, right?
Sure, once at startup.
- argp limitation, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/10
- Re: argp limitation, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/10
- console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/10
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/11
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/11
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/11
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/11
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/11
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/11
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/12
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/12
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/12
- Re: console stuff (was: Re: argp limitation, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/12
Re: argp limitation, Niels Möller, 2002/03/11