[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run.c translator
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: run.c translator |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:10:16 -0500 (EST) |
> Then you are using a bidirectional pipe: you should really call it a
> socketpair. (Exactly how are you creating it?)
Saying "bidirectional pipe" is descriptive too. :-) They're the same thing.
As we discussed in great detail here at the time, `pipe' now creates a
bidirectional pipe, i.e. it creates a socketpair and does not call
shutdown. This follows what `pipe' nowadays does on FreeBSD, Solaris, and
some other systems. (And of course, it's a feature got by just doing less
rather than adding anything.)
- run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/21
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/21
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20