|
From: | Roland McGrath |
Subject: | Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord |
Date: | Mon, 25 Mar 2002 01:58:24 -0500 (EST) |
> I called it __mach_memcpy so that we can be sure to get the vm_copy > version in particular cases such as this. For pager_memcpy you'd still have to set up the fault handling around the mach_memcpy call, so it remains better for pager_memcpy to have its own check up front.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |